Adaptation, Mitigation and Suffering
I think that covers our options.
Rhetorical adaptation, however, is a political winner. Too bad it means preventable suffering for billions.
|
| We basically have three choices: mitigation, adaptation and suffering. We’re going to do some of each. The question is what the mix is going to be. The more mitigation we do, the less adaptation will be required and the less suffering there will be. |
|
|
This entry was posted on August 29, 2010 at 1:04 pm and is filed under News, Politics, Connect the Dots, Small Foot Print, Global Warming. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site.